charter school grantsThe last day of September was officially the close of the 2013 – 2014 legislative session.
Though the legislature adjourned at the end of August it was the last day for the Governor to sign or veto bills.
The Governor acted on the remaining bills sitting on his desk, signing several hundred of them while also vetoing a fair share of bills. As he has since he began his third term as California’s Governor, the Governor stood firm in his belief of local control, opposed the creation of ‘new programs’ and supported charter school flexibility. He vetoed a number of bills that would have created new regulations in a number of policy areas in the state and, to the surprise of some, he also vetoed a package of ethics reform bills that the legislature passed in response to the indictment of three sitting State Senators (one has been convicted, sentenced and resigned his seat) and an ever growing staffing scandal that has engrossed the Senate and come to light through the testimony of several current Senate staffers in a robbery/murder trial playing out in Sacramento. The trial has provided the public with a rare insight into how the legislature operates and how power is wielded inside the State Capitol.
For charter schools, the end of the legislative session saw no significant changes, but significant victories.
The Governor vetoed the two most egregious bills impacting charter schools (SB 1263 and AB 913) and there was no other negative legislation that passed.
AB 913 was another attempt to create conflict of interest policies and governance accountability for charter schools but the Governor correctly stated that the measure went too far. It was typical legislative overreach as we have seen this type of legislation introduced almost every year for the last decade and a half. Even though AB 913 was vetoed, the discussion is playing out much differently at the local level throughout the state. There are a number of authorizers, especially the Los Angeles Unified School District and the Los Angeles County Office of Education, who are using conflict of interest issues to revoke charter schools. LAUSD and LACOE are reacting much more aggressively than other districts and county offices of education to conflict of interest issues. Some of these cases are ending up in court and some are winding their way through the process and will end up before the State Board of Education, but it has become the new attack line for many authorizers. Charter schools must be prepared for this new frontal assault. Additionally, we will see our opponents introduce a new version of AB 913 when the legislature reconvenes in January.
View the Governor’s veto message on AB 913.
 

Want to share?
Charter School Capital Logo

Since the company’s inception in 2006, Charter School Capital has been committed to the success of charter schools. We help schools access, leverage, and sustain the resources charter schools need to thrive, allowing them to focus on what matters most – educating students. Our depth of experience working with charter school leaders and our knowledge of how to address charter school financial and operational needs have allowed us to provide over $1.8 billion in support of 600 charter schools that have educated over 1,027,000 students across the country. For more information on how we can support your charter school, contact us. We’d love to work with you!

Learn More